AnalysisofthesummaryofthevisionofthenewCodeofCriminalProcedureHowabstractguaranteeofjusticeandefficiencyoftheproceedings,therationalallocationofjudicialresources,howtoconductappropriateproceedingssimplifiedshuntisanimportantcontentofthenationaljudicialreformandimproveprocedures.ThesisKeywordscourseofjusticesummarilyScopeCreationofasummarytrialprocedureofmodifyingtheCodeofCriminalProcedurein1996,thefactsareclearandsufficientevidenceofminorcriminalcasesquickly.Sincethesystemisrunning,theoveralleffectisgood,butalongwiththearrivaloftheperiodofsocialtransition,prominentsocialcontradictions,thedramaticincreaseincriminalcases,evenmoreprominentwiththecontradictionbetweenthelimitedjudicialresources,casealittlemorethanthestatusquobecamejudiciaryfacingproblemsandbottlenecksduetonarrowthescopeofapplicationofthecurrentsummaryofthecaseprocessingpowerhascannotplaytheroleoftheProcedureDivision.effortstoresolvethisoutstandingissue,integratedtreatmentrelationshipoffairnessandefficiency,optimizetheallocationofjudicialresources,theCo---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---deofCriminalProceduretomodifymodifiedsummarychangesandimprovement,butalsoanimportantpartofthelarge.SummarilyScopeaugmentations1996CriminalProcedureLawSection174requirestheapplicationofsummaryprocedurethefollowingthreescenarios:(1pairinaccordancewiththelawcouldbesentencedtothreeyearsimprisonment,criminaldetention,control,punishedwithfines,prosecutioncase,thefactsareclearandsufficientevidence,thepeopleProcuratoratesuggestsoragreestoapplythesimplifiedprocedure(2casestobehandledonly,(3victimssuedtheevidenceofminorcriminalcases.provisionsofthisscopeisratherambiguous.called“Forthecaseofpublicprosecutionthreeimprisonment,thereisnoclearlegalpunishmentordeclaredcriminaltodeterminingthepenaltyandifonlytheseverityofthepenaltyasthebasisofwhetherornottoapplythesimplifiedprocedurewillmakethefactsareclearandsufficientevidence,thedefendantactivelypleadedguiltycouldbesentencedtomorethanthreeyearslegalcriminalcasescannotbequicklyconcluded,itisdifficulttoimprovetheefficiencyandexpandsummarilyScopethenewCodeofCriminalProcedure,208:“Thegrassrootspeople’scourtsjurisdictionoveracase,thefollowingconditionsaremet,canbeappliedtothesumma---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---rytrial:(1casesthefactsareclearandsufficientevidence,(2defendantsadmittheircrimes,noobjectiontotheallegedfactsofthecrime,(3defendantshavenoobjectiontotheapplicablesummaryPeople’sProcuratorate,theprosecution,theproposedPeople’sCourtapplythesimplifiedprocedure“.Accordingly,thesummaryoftheapplicablerangehasbeenexpandedtothegrassrootspeople’scourtsjurisdictioninadditiontoendangeringnationalsecurity,terrorismcases,andmaybesentencedtolifeimprisonment,thedeathpenaltyincasesotherthancriminalcasesoffirstinstance,atthesametime,thenewCriminalProcedureLawLaw20beamendedasfollows:“underthejurisdictionoftheIntermediatePeople’sCourtoffirstinstanceincriminalcases:(1caseendangernationalsecurity,terroristactivities,(2maybesentencedtolifeimprisonment,thedeathpenaltycases,deletetheoriginal”foreignerscriminalcasesinvolvingcrimes.“Accordingtothisprovision,theincreaseintherangeofgrassrootspeople’scourtsjurisdictionoveracaseofcrimescommittedbyforeignersincriminalcases,Thatis,forthecrimescommittedbyforeignersincriminalcases,inl...