AnalysisoftheCivilProcedureLawamendmentregulationmaliciouslitigationMaliciouslitigationisoftheabstractbehaviorofmaliciouscollusionbythepartiestothecourtproceedings,andthusinfringeuponthelegitimateinterestswithrespecttotheoriginalprovisionsoftheCivilProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLawamendmentsetofspecializedtermsthat112provisionsmaliciouslitigationresponsibilityundertheCivilProcedureLaw》》theprovisionsof112,thesubjectofmaliciouslitigationfortwoormoresubjectivecommondamageisintentionalthecommoninjuriousactsobjectively,andresultedinthegenerationoftheconsequencesofthedamage.amendmentoftheCivilProcedureLawofmaliciouslitigationRegulationisstillflawed,andthisdefectismainlymanifestedintheamendmentoftheCivilProcedureLawonlystipulatestheresponsibilityofmaliciouslitigation,withoutsettingofmaliciouslitigationpriorregulatorymechanisms.therefore,ChinashouldperfectPretrialEvidenceExchangeSystemlitemcommitmentsystemtoachievethefullrangeofregulatorymaliciouslitigation.ThepaperKeywordsCivilProcedureLawamendmentsmaliciouslitigationregulation---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---Inmodernsociety,thelitigationasadisputesettlementmeans,onthemaintenanceofthesocialorderandtheprotectionofcivilrightsanditsimportantrole,fairnessandjusticelawcontainingthevalueisanimportantmechanismtoachieveintherealworld,however,inspecificcases,somedonothaveamotiveartificialrealizeitsillegalpurposesmaliciouscollusionlitigationmechanismagainsttheinterestsofothers,theexistenceofthiscase,notonlyagainsttheinterestsofthelitigants,butalsodisrupttheproceedingsorder,damagetothecourseofjusticeandjudicialauthority.theeffectiveregulatorymaliciouslitigation,CivilProcedureLawamendmentincreasestheliabilityofthemaliciouslitigation,thisprovisionisahighlightoftheamendmentoftheCivilProcedureLaw,butthelackoftherequirementcannotbeignored.AmaliciouslitigationOverviewSo-calledmalicious,whichmeanstheheartisincompatiblewiththelegalormoralmeaning,thismeaningorthepurposetoobtainimproperbenefitsforthemselves,orthefactthattheoccurrenceofthedamagesufferedinpursuitoftheinterestsofothers.Maliciouslitigationisthatthebehaviorofpeopleintheirillegalpurposedriven,maliciouscollusiontothecourtsorotherlitigatio---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---nactivities,lossesthroughtheproceedingssothatthelegitimateinterestsofothersbehaviorfromthesurface,maliciouslyofabehaviorof“legitimacy”.Specifically,Chineselawgivescitizenstherighttosue,oftheCivilProcedureLawclearlystipulatestheelementsincivilproceedings,thesefactsonlyformalelements,andcitizensinthecaseoftheseelementsmayinstitutecivilaction,thecourtacceptingonlyreviewtheseelementsarecomplete,withoutreviewoftheseelementsisarealandlegitimate.maliciouslitigationembodiedinitssurfaceformalityFromthispointofview,asthelegalrelationshipbetweenthemainexercisetheirlitigationrights.maliciouslitigation,however,isa“legitimateactsconcealillegitimatepurposes”doesnothavelegitimacybecauseofitspurpose,thispurposeimpropererosionofthelegitimacyofthebasisofthemaliciouslitigation,therebymakingitillegalonprocedurallawmaliciouslitigationasanillegalviolationoftheobjectitis,therearetwo,oneisthelegitimateinterestsofthelitigants,andthesecondisthenationaljudicialorderthatmaliciouslawsuitsdisrupttheproceedingsorder,andinfringeontheauthorityofthejudiciary.Second,theamendmen...