AnalysisofthenewCodeofCriminalProcedureconcerningnewregulationswitnessesresponsesAbstract14March2012theEleventhNationalPeople’sCongressadoptedthefifthmeeting‘ontheEdit《CriminalProcedureLaw》decision’ofthe‘CriminalProcedureLaw’wasamendedwhichamended187,onehundredeighty-eightprovideswitnessesshouldappearincourtcaseandwitnessesrefusedtoappear,thecourtmayrefusetotestifywhenthemeasurescanbeexpectedintherevisedCriminalProcedureLawformallyimplemented,thewitnesseswillbethenorm,infavorofthefightagainstcrime,protectionofhumanrights,itwillalsoworkonthepublicprosecutionbroughtnewchallenges,asthepublicprosecutorshouldbereadytorespondpositively,inordertobetterperformcriminalcomplaintandlegalsupervision.PaperKeywordsprosecutionwitnessevidenceAmendmenttotheCriminalProcedureLawprovidesforthecaseofwitnessesshouldappearandwitnessesrefusedtoappear,thecourtmayrefusetotestifywhenthemeasurestakenbywitnessesisboundtobecomethenorm,ontheimplementationoftheCriminalProcedureLaw,‘punishmentofcrime,protec---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---tionofhumanrights,’thetaskofgreatsignificanceatthesametime,workonthepublicprosecutionalsobroughtacertainimpact,publicprosecutiondepartment,theprosecutorshouldbereadytorespondpositively,inordertobetterfulfilltheallegedcrimeandthelegaloversightfunctions.ThenewCodeofCriminalProcedureprovidesfortheobligationofwitnessestotestifyincourt,butdoesnotrequirenon-appearanceofresponsibility,resultinginverylowrateofwitnesses,witnessestestifyfreshpracticesituation.Prosecutorsalsousedwithoutwitnesses,thetrialonlywaytoreadthetestimonyofwitnesses.Thiswitnessdoesnotappearincourttrialmode,limitingthedefendant’srighttocounseloffacetofacecross-examination,reducingthecredibilityofthetestimonyofwitnesses.Toaddressthissituation,therevisedCriminalProcedureLawprovidesforthesystem,andseveralwitnessestotestifyundernolegalconsequencesandrefusedtotestifyincourtandlegalresponsibility.Thismodificationwillgraduallychangethecurrentbasicnon-appearanceofwitnesseslitigationmode,graduallyapproachingtheWesternadversarialtrial,theprosecutorwillreviewthetestimonyofwitnesses,examinationofwitnessesandtrialresilienceputforwardnewdemands.---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---First,thevalueofWitnessSystemWitnessdoesnottestifyistoamendtheCriminalProcedureLawandcriminallitigationbeforepracticeoftencriticizedoneoftheplaces,criticsarguethatthewitnessdoesnotappeartoacceptcross-examination,deniedthedefendant’srighttocross-examination,violatedthedefendant’srights,notwithdueprocessvalue.Althoughthetestimonyofwitnesses(critical,directcontactwiththefactsofthecasethewitness)isdirectevidence,isconducivetoabetterunderstandingofthejudgethemerits,butbecauseofthetestimonyofwitnesseswithgreatsubjectivity,especiallywiththecaseofaninterestedwitnesstestimony,thereperjuredpossible,andaskthewitnessjustacceptwithoutinvestigationdepartmenttoappearbeforeacross-examination,thewitnesstestimonywillnotbetoomuchpressureandquestions,sofeelfreetoprovidetestimony;addition,transcriptsarefurthertestimonyrecipientsprocessing,andsomedoesnottrulyreflectthetestimonyofawitness,insomecases,thesesmalldifferencesmayleadtoqualitativelydifferentcases.Therefore,theadmissibletestimonyofwitnesseswerenot---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---cross-exam...