AnalysisoftheCriminalProcedureLawCivilProceduremodificationsoflegislativelanguagespecificationAbstractsappropriatelegislativelanguagetobuildareasonable,logicalstructure,andexpressionoftheappropriatelegal,andmoreconducivetotheapplicationofthelaw.CriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLawoftheabsorbedCriminalmodify,practicalexperienceandtheoreticalcivilactionsummaryforourcriminallitigation,civillitigation,actualembodiestheresultsofourcriminal,civilreform.However,modificationsoftheCriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLawinthelegislativelanguage,therearestillsomeneedtobeimproved,suchasthetheunificationofthelegislativeframework,thelogicofthelegislativelanguagesemantics,etc.Thispaperattemptstocarryouttheanalysisoftheseissues,andputforwardanumberofrecommendations.ThePaperKeywordsCriminalProcedureLawCivilProcedurelegislativelanguageMarch14,2012,thefifthsessionoftheEleventhNationalPeople’sCongressexaminedandadoptedthe1decisionoftheNationalPeople’sCongressonAmendingtheCodeofCriminalProcedure,PresidentHuJintaoofthePeople’sRepublicofChinasignedthePresidentialDecreeof55,announcedthedecision,effectiveasofJanuary1,2013toAugust31.2012years,thetwenty-eighthofthe11thStandingCommitteeoftheNationalPeople’sCongressvotebythedecisionoftheStandingCommitteeoftheNationalPeople’sCongressonAmendingtheCivilProcedureLaw,since2013effectivedateofJanuarythispoint,modifythedurationofthelong,wide-rangingcomments,viewpointsdiscusstwofierceProcedureLawmodifyfinallysettled,butbasedontheCriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLawtomodifyarousedtheoscillationandEnforcementwillproducefar-reachingimpactofitsresearchamongscholarsisintheascendant.DiscussionandaftertheimplementationoftheCriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProceduremodifiedresearchscholarsfocusmainlymodifytheguidingideology,basicprinciples,thebasicsystemandotherspecificissues,fromthepointofviewofthelegislative2languagestudysmaller,morerepresentative<<OnChina’sCriminalProcedureLawofthelegislativelanguageperfect>><<legislativelanguageandlogicspecification-CodeofCriminalProcedurefortherawmaterials>><<<CivilProcedureLaw>improperuseofmicro-probe>>language>><<definitionofthetermsoftheCivilProcedureLaw.Thelegislativelanguageisthelanguageusedbythelegislatorsinthelegislativeprocess,thetextaswellasthelanguageofthelawmustfollow.Legislatorslegislativeintent,legislativepurposemustbereflectedinthelegislativelanguage.Appropriatelegislativelanguagetobeabletobuildareasonablestructure,logicrigorous,appropriatelegalexpressioninappropriatelegislativelanguagewillaffectanapplicablelegalandacademicvalues,andevenleadtoambiguityandcontroversy.therefore,thelegislativequalificationstoattachimportancetothestudyofthelegislativelanguageinthelegislativework,inLegalDraftingmakingprocesstoseektheviewsoflinguists.3Accordingly,theauthorintendstocombinethebeforeandaftermodificationoftheCriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLawofthespecificlawarticle,fromtheperspectiveofnormativestructure,logic,terminologyandexpressiondosomepreliminaryexploreandsuggestamendments.,CriminalProcedureLaw,CivilProcedureLawinthesameorsimilarchaptersexistdifferentlegislativeframework,itisrecommendedthataunifiedLegislativeframeworkreferstothecontentsofthelegalstructurearrangements.Legislativeframeworkisatechnicalproblem,handledwell,notonlyconducivetothesmoothintroductionofthelaw,ismoreconducivetotheunderstandingandimplementati...