AnalysisofCriminalProcedurealsodesirabletointroducePleaBargainSystemAbstractThisarticlefromthecountrydoesnothavethebackgroundandimplementationofpleabargainingandpleabargainingsystemandtheconditionsofChina’scurrentlegalconcepts,thejudicialsystemisnotcompatiblediscussestwoaspectsofcriminalproceedingsalsodesirabletointroducepleabargainingsystem.BackgroundPaperKeywordsCriminalPleaBargainPleaBargainSystemoriginatedintheUnitedStates,butalsointheUnitedStatescriminallawprovisionsaretypical.AccordingtotheU.S.BLACK’SLAWDICTIONARY(SIXTHEDITIONSixthEdition)interpretationofpleabargainingcalledPleabargainingorPleaagreement,itsmeaningissignedbytheprosecutorbeforetheindictment,theProsecutormayasanationalrepresentativeonbehalfofthesameasthedefendant’scounselonwhetherthedefendantguilty,theseverityofthepenaltiesimposedfortransactionstoreachamutuallysatisfactoryagreement.PleaBargaintypicallyincludesthefollowingthreeways:First,reducethe1allegationreferstotheprosecutoragreedtobelighterthantheoriginalallegedoffensesallegedagainsttheaccusedinexchangeforthedefendant’sguiltyplea.Twoistoreducethecharges,whenadefendantisguiltyofseveraloffenses,theProsecutortoconductonlyoneallegedcrime,whileotherswithdrawchargesofasaconditionforthedefendant’sguiltyplea.ThreeisthepenaltyTradesreferprosecutorsagreedtoajudge’ssentencingrecommendationfavorofthedefendant,thedefendantBranchOfficerecommendedthepenaltyoftheirconsent,inexchangeforthedefendant’sguiltyplea.Afterthepleaagreementbetweentheparties,ingeneral,thecourtwillnolongerbeasubstantivetrialofthecase,butonlyintheformofmutualrecognitionagreement.Onlywhenthecourtheldthatthepleabargainingcontentviolatestheprinciplesofjusticeandfairness,thecourtcanrefusetoacceptthepleabargain,butthisisextremelyrareinjudicialpractice.Generally,thejudgewillrespectprosecutorscommitmentsmadebythedefense.Inpublicopinion,pleabargainingisbetrayed2justice,thecourtbacklogofsomedefendantsweredrilledtoospinelessprosecutorandloopholes,donotgetitshouldbesubjecttopunishment.However,criminaljusticepersonnelthoughtthatpleabargainingisnecessaryinstitutionaloperation,thereasonisverysimple:thereisnotenoughresourcestojudgeallcases.Inordertocoordinatethepublicandthejudiciaryinpleabargainingcontradictionsinstateandfederalgovernmentsthroughfurtherimprovementoflegislationtoimprovethepracticeofpleabargainingexistsdisorganized,randomnessandunpredictabilityotherdefects.Moreover,incountriesotherthantheUnitedStates,theimplementationofpleabargainingsituationisdifferent.Thepleabargainingsystem,suchasItalyandtheUnitedStatesdifferontheItalian-stylepleabargainingisnotthedefendantguiltypleaaspleabargainingasaprerequisite,sincethedraftingofthenewItalianCodeofCriminalProcedureareconcerned,asapreconditiontopleadguiltypleabargainingwouldunderminetheItalianConstitutionguaranteedtoall3defendantstoimplementtheprincipleofpresumptionofinnocence.AnotherexampleisthetraditionalcivillawcountriesFrance,untiltodaystillprohibitpleabargaining,theFrenchtheoristsinsistthat:therighttoasocialindictment,theprosecutionmerelytoinstituteandundertakeprosecution,butnottherighttocarryonthepublicprosecutionpunishment,therefore,prosecutionauthoritieshavenorighttotradewiththedefendant,beentitledtorequirethedefendantorthevictimtothestatetreasurytopayacertainamountofmoney,thatistostoptheperpetratorsbeprosecuted,so,unlessauthorizedbythead...