ChineselanguageandliteraturetoexploretheapplicationoftransformationChinesefigureofspeechasthe“intertextuality”isatraditionalChineseculture,buthaslessimportanceforusinmodernlife,moreawarenessofthegenerallackofuse,sothereisneedforfurtherstudy,whiletheriseoftheWest,alate20thcenturypost-modernism,whichemphasizestherelationshipbetweenthetextofliterarytheoryconceptof“intertextuality”(intertextuality),butalmostinourconventionistranslatedas“intertextuality.”Ibelievethat,althoughbothinthelanguageofscience,cognitivethinking,expressionandsotheremaybesomelinkorcoincide,butonthe“intertextuality”,“intertextuality,”thetwoconceptsshouldbejustacoincidencethatliterally,nottheintrinsicnatureofcontact:bothbelongtodifferenttheoreticalcategory,meaninganduseisalsoquitedifferent.forGrowing,weshouldinheritandcarryforward,forthelatter,wewillhavethecourageto“used”tobegood“used.”First,intertextuality.Intertextualtheso-called1“intertextualityseejustice,”isbasedontheexpressionofstylerestrictionsorspecialneeds,meaningtwoormoreassociatedorcorrelationbetween,cancomplementeachother,penetrateeachotheroreachotherrestrictionseachothershowsthestructureoflanguageunitsinacertainorderlistedtogether,toplayasuccinctdeep,mixedandothereuphemisticrhetoricspecificartisticeffects.intertextualityislearningtoseeintheancientpoetryofexpression,inChineseculture,thisexpressionwayevenbeforetheHanandTangDynastiesinSpringandAutumnperiodofgreatdevelopmentlanguagehasmadesignificantprogress,reachingmaturity.Therefore,thetraditionalorconventionalintertextualityintertextuality,bothofwhichhavesomeofthis,butforvariousreasons,especiallytheriseoftheNewCultureMovementahundredyearsago,thevernacularafterthebirthanddevelopment,theuseofintertextualityinthisexpressionhavebecomerare,Weseemtobeshelved,thegrowingdivideus,rusty,sonowallofus,includingvarioustypesoflightmediumandsmallschoollanguageteacherstotheintertextual,oftenis,“theancientpoetry,poetrywriterusedwhenmaking2arhetorical“itisonlyuptointertextualityasanalready”deadart“toappreciatethisrealityshouldcauseusalert.Thisrecognitionnotonlyseparatesthetradition,intertextualitymaystiflethesurvivalanddevelopmentlife.Second,intertextuality,texteachother.“Intertextuality”isalate20thcentury,theriseoftheWestofatextemphasizestherelationshipbetweenthecoreconceptsofliterarytheory,usuallytwoormoreofthetextbetweenthe“interaction“relationshipasa”newcriticismofhistoricismandabackwash,“and”intertextuality“asapost-modernistliterarytextstrategy,penetrationinavarietyofpost-modernliterature(includingmeta-fiction,meta-poetry,anti-narrative,purefiction,parody,collage,etc.),whichisavaluefreeofcriticalpracticeiscalled“intertextualityrevolution”-structuralistcriticsgiveahistoricalandevolutionarymode,trytoapplyeachMantheory,tolookandlocatethehumanities,socialsciencedisciplinesaswellasthenaturalrelationshipbetweencriticalpractice.Thiscriticismdoesnotbelongtoaparticularpracticegroup3criticism,butthe20th-centuryEuropetoseveralimportantintellectualmovementrelated,suchasstructurallinguistics,psychoanalysis,Marxism,Russianformalismanddeconstructionitsrepresentatives,includingBakhtin,HaroldBloom,Roland-BarthesandJuliaKristeva,etc.reallypusheachotherManofthesexualrevolutionandthetheoreticalsystemconstructedtextandtheconceptofintertextuality,whenpushed,twowell-knowncriticofParis-BartandKristev...