AnalysisofCriminalSummaryProceduremodificationsimpactonprosecutionsAbstractThispaperbrieflydescribesthenewCodeofCriminalProcedureformodificationofsummaryprocedure,pointingouttheproblemsfacedbytheprosecution,andthepracticalimplicationsoftheproposedcountermeasures,hopingtoprovideareferencefortheprosecutorialpractices.PaperKeywordssummaryjusticejudicialefficiencyprocuratorialworknewCodeofCriminalProcedureFirst,theconceptofsummaryAsimplifiedprocedureisthroughcertainaspectsofcriminalprocedure,thestepstobedifferentdegreesofsimplification,sothatthecasebeexpeditedprocessingofspecialprocedures.Summaryprocedureisrelativetotheordinaryprocedureintermsof.ithroughtheestablishmentofascientificsummaryprocedure,canachieveasimplifiedshuntcases,safeguardtheproceduralfairnessandbalancebetweentheeffectivenessoftheproceedings.Second,thenewCodeofCriminalProcedureforthe1summaryproceduretoreviseandimproveMarch14,2012throughthe‘CriminalProcedureLawAmendment’(hereinafterreferredtoasthenewCodeofCriminalProcedure)forthe1996CriminalProcedureLawofthesummarymademajormodifications,mainlyforthefollowingaspects:(A)toexpandthescopeofsummaryprocedureArticle208ofthenewCodeofCriminalProcedureofthesummaryprocedurethepositiveconditionthatcasethefactsareclearandsufficientevidence;defendantvoluntarilypleadedguilty;defendantagreestotheapplicationofsummaryprocedure;Section209providesforsummaryprocedurenegativeconditions,inotherwords,applicationofsummaryprocedurecases,itisnecessarytocomplywiththeconditionslaiddown208,butalsodoesnotbelongto209providedseveralcasesbeforetheycanapplythesimplifiedprocedure.Contrast1996CodeofCriminalProcedureArticle174canbeseen:(1)nolongerfromthepenaltyspecies,theseverityofsentencingaspectoftheapplicableconditionsspecifiedsummaryprocedure,butisclearfromthefactsofthecase,whetherthedefendantpleadedguilty,thetrialis2simpleangletobeprovided,andtrulyfittheoriginalpurposeoftheestablishmentofsummaryprocedure;(2)AsmaybesentencedtolifeimprisonmentorthedeathpenaltycasesgovernedbytheIntermediatePeople’sCourt,whichcanbeappliedtothecaseofsummaryprocedureisbasicallytheCourt’sjurisdictionextendedtothegrassrootslevelallindictablecasesandaprivateprosecution.Thesechangesexpandthescopeofapplicationofsummaryprocedure,isboundtomakeapplicationofsummaryprocedurecasesincreased.(Two)togivethedefendanttheoptionofsummaryprocedure1996CriminalProcedureLaw,thejudiciaryhasdecidedtosummarilyabsoluteterms,thedefendantisnosubstantivesummaryoftheoptions,thedominantpositionofthedefendantsdidnotberespected.ThenewCodeofCriminalProcedureArticle208clearlystipulatesthedefendantsummaryproceduremustbeagreedinordertogivethedefendanttheoptionprogram,andeffectivelyprotectthedefendant’srights.(Three)Prosecutormustattendthecourt3prosecutornottoattendthecourt,isnotconducivetotheestablishmentofadversarialmodelisnotconducivetodealwithcasesofsubstantivejusticeisnotconducivetosafeguardingproceduralrightsoftheparties,isnotconducivetofulfilltheirlegaloversightresponsibilities.iiBasedmaycausemanyproblems,thenewCodeofCriminalProcedureArticle210,paragraph2,clearlystatesthat‘publicprosecutiontriedthroughsummaryprocedure,thePeople’sProcuratorateshallattendthecourt.’Ofcourse,theapplicationofsummaryprocedureprivateprosecution,theprosecutornaturaldidnotappearnecessary.(Four)TrialisnolongerlimitedDurenshenpansummaryprocedurecasesasthesamemayb...