AnalysistrialdetentionperioddefinedinthecontextofthenewCodeofCriminalProcedureAbstractThisarticleisbasedexplorethelegislativeintentofthenewCodeofCriminalProcedure,andthenatureoftheattributesandcharacteristicsofanalysistrialdetentionperiod,todiscussthedefinitionofthetrialdetentionperiod.Strivetodoubledeparturefromthefitoftheoryandpractice,bydemonstratingtrialdetentionperiodrelativetothehearingindependentsignificanceoftheperiodfromthelevelofprinciplesandstandardsonthedefinitionofthetrialdetentionperiodtostarton.PaperKeywordstrialdetentionperiodforthetrialperioddefinedCriminaltrialpracticechargethedefendantforalongtimeundecideduncommon,hasbecomeacontinuousaccumulationofillsandhasnotbeenasignificantimprovementintrend.Reversethissituationwiththesocialistruleoflawmoderntrendoftheline,contrarytotherespectandprotectionofhumanrightsjusticeconceptatthesametime,butalsogreatlydamage1thecredibilityoftheadministrationofjustice.specificationduetotheCriminalLawinthelackofacleardefinitionofthetrialdetentionperiod,resultinginthelackofareasonableregulation,andhearingorgansleftimproperself-servinginterpretationofspace.2012legislaturecriminalProcedureLawtomakemajorchangestotherelevantprovisionstoadjustandsupplement,butstillnotenoughtochangethesystemoftrialdetentionperiodformissingtheembarrassingsituation.combinedwithpracticaladditiontothelegislativeintentoftheproperinterpretationoftheprovisions,hasimportantpracticalsignificance.Trialdetentionperioddefinedindifficulty(OnetrialdetentionperiodforlegislativedefectsThe1997CodeofCriminalProcedureorthenewCodeofCriminalProcedure,werenotdirectlymentiontheconceptoftrialdetentionperiod,normakedirectprovisionfortrialdetentionperiodfordomaindomainrelevantjudicialinterpretationofthenatureoftheprovisionsofambiguitynotuptoexplaintheeffectastheSupremePeople’sCourt,SupremePeople’sProcuratorate,theMinistryofPublicSecurityjointly2issuedin2000<<onthestrictimplementationoftheCodeofCriminalProcedure,toeffectivelycorrecttheextendeddetentionnotice>>statesthat“crimehasbeenincustodysuspects,defendants,theirfulllegaldetentionperiodmustbeimmediatelyreleased,wheretheinvestigation,prosecutionandadjudicationofactivitieshasnotyetbeencompleted,needtocontinuetoverifythetrial,accordingtothelawtochangethecoercivemeasuresreleasedonbailormonitorlive,givefullplaytobailawaitingtrial,tomonitortheresidenceofthetwomandatorymeasures,doinvestigationofcrimesandprotectingthesuspect,thedefendant’slegitimaterightsandinterestsoftheunityofthetrialstage,wheretheso-called“statutorydetentionperiodshouldbeforwhatunderstandingoftherequirementsandnottomakefurtherinstructionsexplainedfromtheCodeofCriminalProcedureandtherelevantlegislation,judicialinterpretationtobeinvestigatedwithoutatrace.Inaddition,whilenotdirectlydefinedinthetrialdetentionperiod,avarietyofobviousconflictbetweentheprovisionsofthejudicialinterpretationofthenature3suchastheSupremePeople’sProcuratorate,theSupremePeople’sCourt,theMinistryofPublicSecurityjointlyissuedin1998aboutthestrictimplementationoftheCodeofCriminalProcedureprovisionsondetentionperiodforsuspects,defendantsandresolutelyrectifytheproblemofextendeddetentionnoticeprovideduponthehandleofthedefendantsincustodycases,theneedtoconsulthigherauthorities,referrals,replytimeshouldbeincludedinthecase-handlingperiod,notifythe<<>>specificallyforthespecificationdetentionper...