AestheticrenaissancewiththenewwayofdoingaestheticsSincethefoundingofNewChina,fromthe1950suntiltoday,ChinahasexperiencedthreeaestheticdevelopmentboomandIthinkthesethreecrazereferredtoas“thegreatdebateaesthetics”,“Aesthetics”and“aestheticrenaissance”.“AestheticsBigTalk“,referringtothe50sfromthe20thcenturybeganthediscussiononaesthetics.Thisdiscussionhasbeenextendedtotheearlyyearsofthe1960s.Withthe”CulturalRevolution“isapproaching,thisdiscussionhasgraduallygivenwaytomoreforthedirectpoliticalandliterarydebates.“Aesthetics”isfrom1978onwards,with“thinkinginimages”asthebeginningofthediscussionofaestheticcraze.Thisboomlasteduntilthelate1980s,thereafterassocial,economic,culturalinstitutesandsomeotherdisciplinesreplaced.occurredinthelate20thcenturyanewaestheticboomyears,Iwouldliketocallit“aestheticrevival.”aestheticsofthisnewroundofdevelopment,theemergenceofmanynewtopicsin1thedisciplineswithintheprofoundchangeshavetakenplace.Anaestheticcriticismdilemma:TalkingfromalittlestorySpokeof“renaissance”,Iwouldliketotalkfromastoryafewyearsago,thereisabetonabookofliteratureandphilosophycalled<<>>Englishmagazine,whichreadasmallarticleabouttheUnitedStatesauniversityprofessorofliteratureapersonalexperience.articlesaystheprofessorandseveralotheronceaprofessoratthedepartment,outsidetheschooltoanewdoctoralgraduatestojobinterviewtheinterviewerwhoaskedherinaccordancewithconventionaleducationanddoctoralstudiescasestudy,Dr.repliedVictorianBritishpoetry.Subsequently,inaccordancewithrequirementsofthedoctoralstudentsfromapoemtalk,spenddeconstruction,newhistoricism,feminism,andothereverynewdoctrine,somecriticsofpopulartoolswillplayvividly,showingherunderstandingofcontemporarytheory.heardherexhausted,aprofessorastheinterviewerasked:“Butdoyouthinkthatthispoemisapoemyou“unexpectedisthatthissimplequestion2stumpedtheeloquentandskilleduseofmoderninstrumentsofcriticismPhD,shecannotfindtherightwordstoexplainthiswork”good““bad“ornot,cannotanswerthatitisnotagoodpoem.whetherthisPhDwaseventuallyhired,Idonotknow,butthathasnothingtodowithusandweareconcerned,issuchamethodisappropriatequestioningTheinterviewercanaskwhetherthisisagoodpoemquestionstheappropriatenessofcoursedoso,noschoolwouldmakesucharequirement.Theprofessorafterwardsself-doubt:theliterarydepartmentatAmericanuniversities,aretheremanyyearswithoutteachingstudentshowtotalkaboutpoetry,“good”and“bad”Somanynewdoctrineemerged,notkeepup,okaythenold-fashionedway,with“good”and“bad”,thatis,withtheaestheticevaluationtopesterstudentswithoutaskingmanyofthemostfashionabledoctrine,suitableforyouafewlethargicelderly,donotwanttokeepupwiththetimes,nortoacademicconferencesandacademiccutting-edgecharacterencounters,justkeepmakingthingsdifficultathometomakethingsdifficultforthehomeareaskingstudentstoourselves,Whatkindofskills,ofcourse,this3isnottosaythereisnoaestheticsense,wereadliterature,likeschool,donotlikedonotreadthisthereare“good”and“bad”problems,andwecanalsotellafriend,classmates,colleagues,family,andtodayIsawagoodmovie,readagoodnovel.youcansee!shouldsee!Fromthelookinmypraise,showahighdegreeofcertainty,onekindoffatappreciationfromtheheart.Thisworkgood!butexactlyhowtoansweris:Doyouseetheknow!notsayanything,notheoreticaltermscandescribeit,Idid,butwithanairof,tone,toconveyanaestheticsense,whichispossible,thissituationiscommon;however,ther...