China’stheoreticalinnovationofmoderntortlawandCommentsKeywords:Modern,torttheorysubsumtion,civilhistorySummary:AlthoughthecontentsoftortlawinancientChinaisabundant,buttheinstitutionalnormsandtheoreticalstudiesarelaggingbehind.ModernjuristsofschoolsupportgroupstoenrichtheoreticalinnovationandthecouragetotaketheWestandChinamoderntortlawdoctrineinherentinpractice,createdourcompletetheoreticalsystemoftortlastudyofmodernChineserefinedtortlaw,tortlawtheoryincontemporaryPerfectionisstillnobenefit.theoreticalinnovationsofmodernjuristscourage,morevalueadmiration.First,China’straditionalconceptoftortlawsystemandthelawoflimitationsInancientChina,thebrilliantcivilizationlaw,tortlawhasaplace.InductionbyProfessorYangLixin,thecontentoftortlawinancientChinaisstillrelativelyabundant,includingthefollowing:preparecompensation,compensationofthesale,folding---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---compensationchaseemployedrentmoney,comingfrombothrestitutionofficer,alsoofficer,totheLord,redeembronzekillerhome,payoffthepropertyagesupport,chaseburningburiedsilver,PaulGu,restoration,repairstand,responsibilitytofindother[1].Ofcourse,needlesstosay,China’straditionalconceptoftortlawsystemandmethodisrelativelybackward,incontrasttothemoderntortlaw,whichismainlyattributedtothebackwardnessofChina’sancientcommodityeconomyandcivilrelationsissimple.TheauthorbelievesthatChina’straditionaltortlawsystemandthemethodandlimitationsoflegalisticconceptismainlyreflectedin:(Includingtortlaw,includingatraditionofcivillawweakTraditionalauthoritarianimperialpowerandRestrainingCommerceresultincivillawunderdevelopment.CivillawaspectsofancientChinahouseholds,married,Claims,tort,Landandinheritancedisputes,thesefeudalautocraticrulersareinsignificantintheeyesof“trifles”imperialpoweristhecoreofeverything,istherulerofthemainfocus,---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---protectionoftherightsbetweenprivateapparentlysecondary.Whereassuchcivildisputesgenerallyneithercausesocialunrestornationalperilandwouldnotthreatenthesafetyofpersonsorlife,soeveniftheyareofficialacceptance,andthoseassociatedwithimperialpowercomparedtomajorcases,butalsobecauseonly“trivia”butonlyoffirstinstancefinalappealsystem[2].judgewillTrytobemajorissuestominoronesoutastheidealstate,whetherinthestatutesorinpractice,canonlybebythemagistrate,“self”,andnotbothertolistentotheditch,whichisundoubtedlythefeudallegislationtionofthepeoplewholightoneofthecauses.RestrainingCommerceinitiatoroftheideaofthestateofQinientsaddle,hefirstproposeda“thingofthebanattheend,”theidea[3].feudalrulersaretobeused.Thisleadstoanaturaleconomicprosperityandcommodityeconomylanguished.naturallydominatetheeconomyhasledtotheunderdevelopmentofcivillaw,civilrightsandnowaytoestablishthesystemandprotection,nottomentiontheformationofthesystemoftortlawandtortnormativesystemLawconcept.---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---(TwonosenseofmoderntortlawAsweallknow,theancientChinesemethodprimarilycriminallawinancientChina,formoreseriousviolationsagainsttheperson’srightsor,inmostcasesbycriminalsanctions,anditssanctionsresulttheyoftencontentwithcivilcompensation.Thoughtheresectionappliesonlytociviltortdamages,butthisisaverysmallnumberofcases.·Suchaprovisioncanonlyberegardedasatbestapurelytortbuddingorearl...