AnAnalysisofthelegitimacyofthecriminalreconciliationfoundationandtheCriminalReconciliationSystemConstructionAbstractsofcriminalreconciliationisinthecourseofcriminalproceedings,inthejudiciary(investigativeorgans,procuratorialandjudicialpresidedoverthemediation,onthebasisofmutualequalityandvoluntary,sothattheperpetratorsandvictimsdirectnegotiation,communicationandexchangeunderstandingofthevictimintheoffender,thevictimrequestsorconsentstothejudiciaryontheoffenderalighter,mitigateorexemptedfromcriminalpunishment,thejudiciaryishurtingalighter,mitigateorexemptedfromcriminalpunishment,thefinalsettlementofcriminaldisputesthesystemthispaperfromthefoundationandlegalbasisofthetheoryofcriminalreconciliationasastartingpointtoexplorehowtobuildacriminalreconciliationsystemwithChinesecharacteristics.PaperKeywordscriminalreconciliationtheoreticalbasisofthelegalbasisfor,Judicialstaffinthejudicialpracticehowaccurate1applicationofcriminalreconciliation,therearemanyquestions,so,carryouttheworkoftheCriminalReconciliationTosolvethebasisofitslegitimacy,andtoclarifyitsscope,conditionsandproceduresapplicable.A,criminalreconciliationlegitimacyproblems-theoreticalbasisandlegalbasisThetheoreticalbasisofthecriminalreconciliationmultitude,somescholarsbelievethatthetheoryofbuildingaharmonioussocietyinChinaconstitutesafundamentaltheoreticalbasisofthecriminalreconciliation,somescholarsinChina’sthousandsofyearsoftraditionalcultureandhistoryandcultureasacriminalreconciliationtheoreticalorigin,butIbelievethat,fromthehistoryoftheriseanddevelopmentofthecriminalreconciliationprocess,therestorativejusticemodelofrestorativejusticetheoryasthetheoreticalbasisofthecriminalreconciliationismorereasonableastheantithesisofretributivejusticetheory,restoreafulldescriptionofthetheoryofjusticefromthepointofviewofsocietybasedonthetheoreticalbasisofthecriminalreconciliation.restorativejusticetheoryisthattheapplicationofthepenaltydoesnotsolvethecrime2problem,butexacerbatedtheconflictbetweentheoffenderandthevictim,sotosolveacrimefirstcommittedtorepairdamagedsocialrelationshipscrimetomakeupforthedamagecausedbythecrime,ratherthanfocusontheimplementationofseverepenaltiesperpetratorsrestorativejusticetheoryofcriminaljusticemigratefromtraditionalpunitiveandretaliatorypunishmentbythecriminalactsagainstvictimsaswellasshockssocietyitself,thecenterofgravityoftheadministrationofjusticenotonlybasedonhowthecrimeshouldbepunished,andtheattentionoftheappropriateonthecrimeagainsttheinterestsofthemembersofsocietytobemadeupbytheshockofthesocialasmuchaspossibleberepair,criminaljusticeshiftfromconfrontationtodialogue,fromsanctionstorecovery.restorativejusticetheoryemphasizescriminalviolationsofthelegitimaterightsandinterestsofvictims,adheretothedominantpositionofthevictimsinthecriminaljustice,thestateasacrimeagainstanotherobject,itsstatusgraduallyevolvedfromtheotherpartytothecontradictorycontradictorycoordinator,themissionofthecriminaljusticefromtherealizationoftherightof3nationalpenal,legalauthoritymaintenancesothatinthesocialconflictmediationanddisputestabilize.thecriminalreconciliationprominentcharacteristicsisnolongercrimejustasanationalproblem,buteffortstoseekaharmoniousbalancebetweenthecountry,crimeandthevictims.Legalbasisforcriminalreconciliation,althoughthecurrentlegislationisnotyetclearlydefinedsystemofcriminalreconciliation,butourlaws...