AnalysisofthecourseofjusticeundertheconceptoftheCriminalProcedureReformAbstractnewamendmentstotheCodeofCriminalProcedure,thecommutationprocessandnosubstantialimprovement,thecommutationprocessinChinainrecentyearsexposedmanyproblemsstillhavenotbeenresolved,andinfluencethecourseofjustice.CommutationprocessinChinadrawbacks,itisnecessaryforcommutationprocesstoreconstruct,toensurethatcriminalproceedingslastoneprogramopen,fairandimpartial,tomaximizethecourseofjustice.ThePaperKeywordscommutationprogramchallengesreconfigurableAcommutationproceduresoutlinedinChinaCommutationprocess,namely,thecommutationoftheapplicableprocedures,refertothejudiciarytoreducetheoriginalpunishmentofcriminalsduringtheexecutionofpunishmenttruerepentanceorrendersmeritoriousactmustfollowthestatutoryprocedures.Commutationofsentenceforcriminalsinourcountry,thelegalbasisforcriminallaw,therelevantprovisionsoftheCodeof1CriminalProcedure,andtheprisonlaw,however,thenormsofthelawofthecommutationprocessistoosimpleandatthesametimeoftheexecutionofpunishmentpracticeseriouslyoutofshape,resultinginthecommutationtheinherenttopromotecriminalspositiveacceptseducationandreform,reflectthevalueofthehumanitarianspiritofthesystemgreatlyderogatory,andleadtoaseriousmiscarriageofjusticeandthecorruptionofpower,hastosomeextentaffectedtheconfidenceofcitizensCriminalsandvictims,includingtheauthorityofthejudiciaryandjudicialjustice.Currently,ourcourthearingonthecommutationcasesbasicallyiscarriedoutinaccordancewiththeproceduressimilartoadministrativeapproval,tosomeextent,itcanbesaidthatthecommutationrulingbutlegallyrecognizedinstrumentissuedbythecourtpursuanttotheexecutiveorganofmeaningpresenttheprisonpenaltyenforcementauthority,thepowerofcommutationmonopoly,thecourt’sdecisionessentiallyhasbecometheneedofaformalprogram.becausethePeople’sCourthearingonthecommutationcasesis2entirelydependentonthecommutationofproposalsputforwardbytheexecutiveorganandshowthatcriminalsrepentormeritoriousperformancewrittenmaterial,andtheprosecutioninthecommutationprocessduetothesamelackofeffectivewaystorecommendcommutationofthePeople’sCourtruledthatthesubstantiveexaminationoftheexecutiveorganofthecommutation,itssupervisoryrole,cannotplayarole,therefore,thecurrentcommutationofsentenceapplicablemechanismsjusttoachieveacertaindegreeofefficiencyrequirements,butfair,just,cannotreflecttheprincipleofopenness.easilyleadtothecorruptionofpowerontheexecutionofcriminals,therepeatedlyexposedcasesofcorruptionintheprisonsysteminrecentyearsacrossthecountrythatisexemplified.Commutationprocessofrefactoringthemacrolegalsystemlevelchallenges(ApairofcriminalexecutionlinksrefactoringcommutationprocessnotpayenoughattentiontocausealackoflegalbasisCommutationofthesentenceasapenaltyduringtheexecutionofthelegalsystem,didnotgetthe3attentionitdeservesinthiscontextofthelegalsystem,thecommutationprocesshasprovisionsinseverallawsintheCriminalLaw,CriminalProcedureLaw,thePrisonLaw,butthecommutationprocessthisbelongtothesamelaw,severallawcrosstheprovisionsofthestatusquo,notonlydidnotmakeittoattentioninacademicresearch,butitsufferedasnubtosomeextent,thelackoftheoreticalresearchleadingtoareducedsentenceappliestobecomeajudicialprocessforgettingthecorner,whicheventuallycausedtheapplicablecommutationprocessoftheexecutionofpunishmentthereisnosufficientlegalbasistofollow.(Theabsenceoftwocriminalp...