AnalysisoftheChineselanguageXsontypeofgroupstructurewiththelawanddiscoursepatternsandfrequencyconstraintsAbstract:Inthispaper,structuresyntaxtheoreticalframework,throughtheanalysisfromalargecorpusofauthenticmaterials,focusedonmodernChinese‘Xtwo’group-typestructurewiththelawandthediscoursemodelanditsconstraintsfrequencystudy:thefirstone,‘Xboth’structurehastheadvantagesof‘pronounpluraltwo’model,‘pronounsingulartwo’model,‘NPsingulartwo’model,‘NPchildrenboth’model,‘NP1+NP2both’modeand‘mixed’modesixgroupswithcommonmode,thesecond,‘Xtwo’groupwiththemodelconstrainedbythelimitedpartsofspeechlaws,personalpronounswithoutrestraintoflaw,mixed-moderejectionofpartsofspeechlawsandlegalfabricunitvalues??andotherformsofconstraintsrestrictingthelaw,theseformslawbythe‘doublesetreferstothe’semanticconstraintsoflaw,thesamereferstothemaximumdosetripleconstraintsoflaw,informationlawandthesemanticvalueofconstraint1levelscloserelationshipbetweenlawandotherlawsofthesemanticconstraintsdominatedthethird,‘Xboth’constituteagroupwithamodeofdiscoursefrequencylevels,‘boththesingularpronouns’modelisnomarkedgroupwithmode,mixedmodeismostmarkedwiththemodelgroup,thefourth,‘two’isatypicalsemanticfeatures[+human],[+informal]and[+recoveryrefers].Keywords:‘Xboth’structure-typegroupwithamodellawrestrictingthefrequencyofdiscourseI.IntroductionNumberisauniversallanguage,thebasiccategory,butthereareafewofthetypesystemthetypeoflanguagedifferences.Canbesingular,plural,dual,orafew.(Comrie,1989,Givón,1993,Croft,2003,Corbett,2005.WebelievethattheChinesehavesingular,dual,threeandplural①,includingsingular,plural,isthemainTypethesingularisitsunmarkedform,suchas:(1a.ConfuciusandhisdisciplesareoftenmadesaintsaftertheBlessedOne.2b.arerespecteddisciplesofConfucius.c.arerespecteddiscipleofConfucius.‘Two’and‘Sa’arethemodernChineselanguage‘doublenumber’,and‘number’SyntaxNotation.‘Two’isstillinthesyntaxofthetransitionphase,thedualattributesofbothindependentanddependent:theformerword,asinExample(2a,thelatteras‘doublenumber’syntaxmarkers,voiceweakenedas‘li?’.②Doublethenumberoflabeled‘both’isthisconcern,suchasthecases(2b.(2a.atotaloffive,Iatetwo,heateSa.b.thetwoofusaregoodfriends.*C.botharegoodfriends.Second,onthe‘two’oftheresearchOn‘two’,oneofthefewcasestudiesofdifferentdegrees3ofattentiontothe‘two’oforigin,partofspeech,semantics,speech,syntacticandtypologicalsignificance.Someexplorethe‘two’origin,buttheirviewsdonothavetimeFirst,asGaoKai(1948that‘both’asdoublethenumberproducedinthelateQingDynasty,butTatsuoOta(1987thatitbeganintheearlyQingDynasty.Someofthediscussion,‘two’partofspeech,suchasWangYanlin(2007statisticsofthe18word(dictionaryfound,found‘two’forthenumerals7,uncertainoftheseven,identifiedasaquantifierofthetwo,identifiedasdoublethenumberofone,identifiedasthewordofachorus.someconcern‘both‘semantics,suchasMr.LvShuxiang(1980that’two‘means’two‘,TatsuoOta(1987alsoholdssimilarviews.somefromthelastpointofconcern’both‘ofthesoundchangeprocess,buteachpointdifferentWeiHong(2006:155believethatthesedifferentperspectivescanbegroupedintotwocategories:theformationofaphoniaandtheformationofchorusthatsaystheformer(suchashorsesTupper,1914,Chao,1980,WuYonghuan,2005arguedthat‘both’because‘two‘or’a‘weakeningandlossofcodaevolved,thelatter(eg,JiangLansheng,1994,41995,FengShout...