Analysisoftheevolutionofthelinguisticturn[Abstract]The20thcenturyistheeraoflinguistics,itoccurredtohumandevelopmenthasbroughtunprecedentedchange.Inthispaper,alongitsdevelopmentandchangestotheliterature,theimpactoftheInstitutetobrieflytalkabouthisdevelopmentandevolution,withaviewtothelinguisticturnhaveadeeperunderstanding.[KeyWords]thedevelopmentofthelinguisticturnofliterarystudiesSincethe20thcentury,theproductionanddisseminationofknowledgeandinformation,bothinsizeandefficiencyhavereachedanunprecedented,amazingheights.‘Information’intohumanexistence,oneofthebasicconditionsforthedevelopmentofhumansocietyintoaveritableinformationsocietyandtheoperationandexchangeofinformationregardlessofmeansofcommunication,aremainlybasedonlanguage,intheformandexistence,andthusalsoknownastheeraofthe‘languageofthe1era.’1,resultinginPhilosophyinthe20thcenturytherewasafundamentalshift,languagereplacedepistemologyasthecentralsubjectofphilosophicalresearch,whichisthehistoryofphilosophycalled‘linguisticturn.’Arationalknowledgeofthelanguageitselfpromotedtothepositionofbasicquestionsofphilosophy,Themainobjectofphilosophyconcernedabouttherelationshipbetweensubjectandobject,orbytheexistenceoftherelationshipbetweenconsciousnessandtheworldturnedtotherelationshipbetweenlanguageandthelanguageissuehasbecomethebasicquestionofphilosophy.Theemergenceofthelinguisticturnwithastrongscientificideologiesofcolor,ispopularintheearly20thcenturyWesternscientificthoughtofMarxismundertheinfluenceasthemainideasofthe20thcenturyscientificdoctrineisaneedforempiricalmetaphysicscannotberuledout,pursuitofobjectivity,accuracyandreliability,withparticularemphasisonmathematicsandlogicasthebasisofthestudyandspecification.2Second,thedevelopmentFromthelinguisticturnofdevelopment,therearetwocontemporaryWesternideologyandculturehadaprofoundimpactonthecharacterworthyofourattention:oneistheSwisslinguistFerdinanddeSaussure,theotheristheGermanexistentialistphilosopherMartinHydeSiegel.Saussure’slinguistictheoryknownastheWesternlinguisticsa‘Copernicanrevolution’,helinguisticsasascience,namely,structurallinguistics,andwouldliketocreateonthebasisofsemioticsHeproposedthatthesymbol(signifier)??andthings(referringto)istherelationshipbetweentheartificialandarbitrary(convention),themeaningistherelationshipbetweenthesymbolsdeterminedaccordancewithSaussure’slinguistictheory,languageisa‘first’isasystemofrulesbythedominantlanguageofsymbols,rules,thesystemdeterminesthesignificanceoftheexpression.Itcanbesaid,thestructureofthewholeideais3rootedinlinguisticsinitsrepresentativeLevi-Strauss,RolandBarthes,AJGreimas,茨维坦托多洛Husbandbelievesthatlanguageisnotonlymediumofliterature,andliterarylife,thewriterwritingtheequivalentofalanguagestudy.Notonlythat,theydonotasaliterarylanguagehasitsownstructuresimilartoaclosedsystemofsigns,theobjectiveofthestudyfromtheindividualtextturnedtotheconstituentelementsofliteraryworks,symbols,symbolism,etc.structuralistliterarytheoryandlinguisticscanbesaidthatmostcloselywithliterarytheoryandtheproduct,suchasLacan’spsychoanalysisveratridine,Bakhtin’s‘polyphonicnovel’theory,areduetoabsorptionoftheresultsofmodernlinguistics,andhelpthemovercomesomeoftheirownshortcomings.Atthesametime,theexcessivevalueofthelinguisticfactorsmechanicallyborrowedlinguisticmodel,thisapproachalsobringsalotofills.Becauseitisalmostinthelit...