AnalysisoftheChineselanguageandliteraturetoexploretheapplicationofthemodifiednetworkWritepapersNet:Chinesefigureofspeechasthe‘intertextuality’isthetraditionalChineseculture,buthaslessimportanceforusinmodernlife,lackofawarenessofmoregeneraluse,sothereisneedforfurtherstudy,whiletheWest20thelateriseofapost-modernism,thetextemphasizestherelationshipbetweenliterarytheoryconceptof‘intertextuality’(intertextuality),butalmostinourconventionistranslatedas‘intertextuality.’Ibelievethat,althoughbothinthelanguagescience,cognitivethinking,expressionandsotheremaybesomelinkorcoincide,butonthe‘intertextuality’,‘intertextuality,’thetwoconceptsshouldbejustacoincidencethatliterally,notthenatureoftheintrinsiclink:thetwoareasaredifferenttheories,meaninganduseisalsoquitedifferent.forGrowing,weshouldinheritandcarryforward,forthelatter,wewillhavethecourageto‘take’,butalsotobegood‘used.’1First,eachtext.Intertextualtheso-called‘intertextualityseejustice,’isbasedontheexpressionofstylerestrictionsorspecialneeds,willhavetwoormorerelatedorthereissignificantcorrelationcanbecomplementaryandmutuallylimitinfiltrationoreachotherandexplainthelanguageofstructuralunitsinacertainorderlistedtogether,toplayasuccinctdeep,suchasaparticularartisticeffecteuphemismmixedrhetoricaldevices.intertextualityislearningtoseeintheancientpoetryofexpression,inChineseculture,thisexpressionwayinlanguageevenbeforetheHanandTangSpringandAutumnperiodofgreatdevelopmenthasmadesignificantprogress,reachingmaturity,sothatthetraditionalortraditionalintertextualityintertextuality,bothofwhichhavesomeofthis,butforvariousreasons,particularlyAcenturyago,theNewCultureMovement,thevernacularafterthebirthanddevelopment,theuseofintertextualityhavebecomerareinthisexpression,weseemtobeshelved,thegrowingdivideus,rusty,sonowallofus,includingvarioustypesofmiddleschool,languageteachersarelighttointertextuality,oftenis,‘poetryofancientpoetrywritersusedwhenmakinga2rhetorical’,atbestonlyhavetointertextualityasa‘deadart’toappreciatethisrealityshouldbearouseourvigilance.thisunderstandingonlyfragmentationofthetraditional,butalsothesurvivalofintertextualitymaystiflethedevelopmentoflife.Second,intertextuality,intertextuality.‘Intertextuality’ofthelate20thcentury,theriseoftheWesternemphasisonthetextofarelationshipbetweenthecoreconceptsofliterarytheory,usuallyreferstotwoormoreofthetextbetweenthe‘interaction‘relationshipasa’newcriticismofhistoricismandabackwash,‘and’intertextuality‘asapost-modernistliterarytextstrategy,penetrationinavarietyofpost-modernliterature(includingmeta-fiction,meta-poetry,anti-narrative,purefiction,parody,collage,etc.),whichisavaluefreeofcriticalpracticeiscalled‘intertextualityrevolution’-structuralistcriticstogiveahistoricalandevolutionarymode,trytoapplyeachMantheory,tolookandpositioningthehumanities,socialandevennaturalsciencedisciplinesoftherelationshipbetweencriticalpractice.Thiscriticismdoesnotbelongtoaparticular3practicegroupcriticism,butwith20thcenturyEuropeanmovementtoseveralimportantknowledgerelated,suchasstructurallinguistics,psychoanalysis,Marxism,deconstructionRussianformalismanditsrepresentatives,includingBakhtin,HaroldBloom,Roland-BarthesandJuliaKristeva,etc.reallypusheachotherManofthesexualrevolutionandthetheoreticalsystemconstructedtextandtheconceptofintertextuality,whenpushed,twoprominentcriti...