AnalysisofthenewCriminalProcedureLawtomodifytheprocuratorialsupervisionworkontheimpactandthinkingAbstractmodifytheCriminalProcedureLawistofurtherstrengthenpunishcrimeandprotectthepeople’sneeds.Atpresent,theworkofpunishingcrimesfacemanynewsituations,therearesomeurgentproblemstobesolved.Meanwhile,thestatepromotetheconstructionofdemocracyandlegalsystemandthepeople’slegalawarenessenhancement,forthemaintenanceandprotectionofciviljusticeputforwardhigherrequirements.ThepartiesareveryconcernedaboutthechangesfacingtheCodeofCriminalProcedure,thejudiciaryandotheraspectsofcriminalprocedurehasalsobeenproposedtomodifytheproposal,therefore,howtofurtherprotectthejudiciaryaccurateandtimelypunishmentofcrime,protectionofcivilrightslitigationandotherlegitimaterightsandinterests,tobecomecurrentlegislatorsandthepeopleneedtoworktogethertothinkabout.PaperKeywordsCriminalProcedureexecutionof1punishmentexecutionParolesupervisiondeliveryCriminalCodeofCriminalProcedureistoregulatetheactivitiesofbasiclegal.China’scurrentCriminalProcedureLawwasenactedin1979,waspartiallyamendedin1996,14March2012adoptedbytheCriminalProcedureCodeamendmentrelatesspecificallytothebasicprinciples,rulesofevidence,andthedefenseofcoercivemeasures,implementationofinvestigativemeasuresandpenaltiesandmanyotheraspectsoftheregulations,macropointofviewofbasicservicesrelatedtoallaspectsofprosecution.TobetterimplementthenewCodeofCriminalProcedure,thispapercombinedwiththeactualworkoftheprison,theprisonserviceinthecurrentcommutation,parole,temporaryprobationandotherlegalsupervisionoftheexecutionofpunishmentwerediscussed.First,thecurrentCriminalProcedurepunishmentinvolvedoversightdeficienciesthatexistinlegislation(A)temporaryprobationdecisionauthorityisnotclear,thedecisionservedontemporaryprobationserviceisnottimelyornot,makingitdifficulttomonitorordifficulttocorrectthecurrentCriminalProcedureLaw,2approvedtemporaryexecutionoutsideprisonauthoritiesshallCcPeople’sProcuratorateapprovedthedecision,butthetemporaryexecutionoutsideprisonapprovalauthority,theinstrumentofratificationofthedeliverytimeisnotprovidedforotherissues,inpractice,theimplementationisabitconfusing.Temporaryprobationdecisionsareusually‘Oncethedecisionwithimmediateeffect’,buttheinstrumentsofratificationareoftenservednottimelyornotserved,whichresultedintheprosecutiondifficulttomonitorordetectthephenomenondifficulttocorrectproblems.(Two)theCourtconcerningreductionofsentence,parolecasestoimplementbatchruledthattheprosecutionisdifficulttoaccomplishinashorttimetoreviewexistingCriminalProcedureLaw,theprosecutionreceivedthecourt’ssentence,parolerulingcopies,consideredinappropriate,itshallinthetwenty-daysorlesstothepeople’scourttocorrectopinions.Practiceduetothepeople’scourtisoftenconcentratedinayeartocarryoutoneortwodraws,rulingcommutationandparoleactivitiestogetheralargenumberofcasesof3hearingruledthattheprosecutionisdifficultinallcaseswithin20daysoftherulingonthecompletionofthereview.Moreover,inmateswiththeprosecutionwhilereceivingthewrittencopyoftheinmatesreceivedacommutationofsentence,parolefromprisonimmediatelyafterthedetermination.Evenifprosecutorsfindanerror,suggestcorrectiveadviceexecutionhastakeneffectsinceruledthattheoffenderhasbeenreleased,theerrorisdifficulttobecorrected,andsomeevengetcorrected,butalsoincreasedthecostofmonitoringandcorrection.(Three)theoffende...