AnalysisofacomprehensiveresponsetotheCriminalProcedureLawAmendmentchallengeofworkingonindictmentAftertheintroductionofamendmentstotheCriminalProcedureLawAbstracts,workonnewregulationsindictment,trialwitnessesincreaseddifficultyofsentencingdebateatestofthequalityandexperienceofthepublicprosecutor,courtsummarilyincreasedworkloadindictment,theevidencereformtestprosecutorscreeningofevidenceandsoforth,inthefaceofthisseriesofchallenges,theprosecutiondepartmentsshouldbegintoaddress,withitsownconcreteactionstomeettheformalimplementationoftheCriminalProcedureLawAmendment.PaperKeywordssentencingevidencesummaryMarch14,2012theEleventhNationalPeople’sCongressadoptedthefifthmeetingofthe‘CriminalProcedureLaw,’thechanges,andwillbeJanuary1,2013comeintoforce.AmendmenttotheCriminalProcedureLawinChina’seconomicandsocialdevelopment,people’sgrowingdemandforjusticeand1theruleoflawinthecontextofcontinuousprogressofcivilizationintroducedforcombatingandpunishingcriminals,maintenanceandprotectionofhumanrightsareofgreatsignificance.AftertheintroductionofamendmentstotheCriminalProcedurefulfillProsecutionFunction,respondtonewchallengesistheprocuratorateprosecutiondepartmentsshouldworktogethertoattentionandstudy.First,theCriminalProcedureAmendmentchallengeofworkingonindictment(A)anincreaseofthetrialwitnessesamendmentincreasesthedifficultyoftheCriminalProcedureLawofWitnessSystem,providesthat‘thepublicprosecutor,thepartyoragentadlitemdisagreeonwitnesstestimony,andthetestimonyofwitnesses,convictionandsentencingofthecasehaveasignificantinfluencepeople’scourtconsidersnecessarywitnessestestifying,thewitnessshouldtestify.‘Italsoaddsexpert,expertwitnesses,a’prosecutor,thepartiesoragentadlitemdisagreeonexpertopinion,thepeople’scourtthattheexpertisnecessarytoappearincourt,expertwitnessshalltestify.notifythepeople’scourt,expertwitnesses2refusedtotestifyincourt,expertopinionmustnotbetakenasthebasis.‘,’publicprosecutor,thepartiesandtheagentadlitemmayapplyforcourtnotifiedexpertisetoattendcourtontheexpertadvicegivenexpertopinion.‘highlightstheaboveprovisionsthecourtinadjudicatingcasesinfuturetestimonialevidencetheimportanceofthePublicProsecution,thewitnesstotestifytheeffectisunpredictable,willundoubtedlyincreasethetrialofdifficulty.1.Witnessesvulnerabletohuman,personalsafetyandotherfactors,althoughbeneficialhearingwitnessestestimonialevidenceforcross-examinationonbothsides,toachievejustice,butbecauseChinaishumansociety,relativesandotherwitnessesvulnerabletomulti-defendantsocialfactors,resultingin‘multi-lessattitude’ofthetraditionalpsychological,orbeworriedabouttestifyingafterthesafetyofthemselvesandtheirfamiliesadverselyaffected,andrefusedtoappearincourttotestifyortochangeconfessions.AlthoughtheCriminalProcedureLawamendmentwasalsomentionedwitnessesandtheircloserelativespersonalsafety3protection,butcoverageisnotwideenough,thespecificimplementationmeasuresisstillrelativelythickpan,inreality,difficulttoimplement.Ontheotherhand,sincethemajorityofcasesoccurredintheurbanfringe,witnesses,mostlymigrants,placeofresidenceisnotclearorchangethemoften,difficulttonotifythecourtbeforethetrialwitnesses,whichalsomakesthewitnessintheinvestigationandprosecutionphaseoftestimonyprobativeforceisaffected.2.Expertwitnessisaskillchallengetheprosecutoraskedforexpertwitnessestochoosemultipleconflictingexpertopinionsandexperto...