AnalysisoftheCriminalCompensationProcedureDeficiencyandImprovementAbstractourcurrentcriminalcompensationprogramexistsunfairprocedures,diversificationorganforcompensatoryobligationsthetheCriminalCompensationCommitteesetunreasonableseriousdefect,whichisnotconducivetoTheclaimantmayrequestcompensation,itisdifficulttoachievethefairnessoftheentity.Thispaperoncriminalcompensationabriefoverviewofthetheoreticalbasisoftheprogram,onthisbasis,totrytoanalyzethemainproblemsofthecurrentcriminalcompensationprogram,andmakesomesuggestionstobebeneficialtotheimprovementoftheCriminalCompensationProcedure.PaperKeywordscriminalcompensationprogramconfirmCompensationCommissiondecidedtobedealtwithfirstOurlegalsystembytheinfluenceoftheconceptofthetraditional“entity,lightprogram”inpracticeoftenignoredtheindependenceoftheprocedurallawofpriority,sparseIdonotknowthesubstantivejusticestill1needtoproceduraljusticeasaguarantee,whileourcurrentcriminalcompensationprogrambutthereareproceduresunjustcompensationobligationsauthoritiesdiversified,theCriminalCompensationCommitteesetunreasonableseriousdefects,Theclaimantmayrequestcompensationoftennotconducivetoprotectionofhumanrightshasfailedtoplayitsduerole,makingtheStateCompensationLawvisible,theperfectcriminalcompensationprogramhasanon-negligibleroleintheprotectionofthepartiestotherightsofcriminalcompensationcases,tomaintainfairnessandjustice.AcriminalcompensationprogramoverviewCriminalcompensationprogramisthewayofthenationalcriminalcompensationcaseacceptanceandprocessingsteps,order,timelimits,andmakecompensationdecisionslawandsimplemeanstosolvetheproblemofcriminalcompensationproceduretobefollowed,mainlytomakethecriminalthecompensationdecisionprocedure,includingthedecisiontoperformprocedures.manyoftheworld’scountriesandregionshavebeenclearlydefinedcriminalcompensationprogram,thetwomainlegislativemodels:2First,thelegislativefocusontheprovisionsoftheCriminalCompensationprogram,thattheStatehasenactedandpromulgatedaseparateCriminalCompensationProcedureActortheCriminalCompensationLaw,tobespecificprovisionsonsubstantiveandproceduralmattersincriminalcompensation,suchasJapan<<>>CriminalCompensationLawinChinaAlthoughnotdevelopthecriminalcompensationspecializedlaw,butspeciallyformulatedforcriminalcompensationentitiesandproceduralissuesintheStateCompensationLaw,Korea<<>>StateCompensationLawisalsotrue.Criminalcompensationprogramapplicabletotheotherprovisionsofthelaw,specificallytheStateCompensationLaworCriminalCompensationLawhasnotyetbeenformulated,butthecontentsofsomeofthesubstantiveandproceduralcriminalcompensationincivil,criminalandotherlegalprovisions,orjustinthejudicialpracticeacriminalcompensationprogramestablishedbycaselaw,suchasSwitzerland,Italyandothercountries.3CriminalCompensationProcedureproblemIsnotdifficulttofind,ourlegislativemodespecialprovisionsintheLawonStateCompensationentitiesandproceduresofthecriminalcompensation.<<>>TheprovisionsoftheLawonStateCompensation,criminalcompensationprogramisdividedintofourstages:(1confirmationprocess.organforcompensatoryobligationsTheclaimantmayrequeststatecompensation,itmustfirstbeaskedtoconfirmthestatutoryinfringementviolations.organliableforcompensationtobeaskedisnotrecognized,theclaimantshallhavetherighttolodgeacomplaint.(2organliableforcompensationhandlerfirst.theclaimantclaimsforcompensation,shallfirstapplytotheo...