ChoiceofConstitutionapplies[Abstract]ToreallyseriouslyandimplementtheConstitution,mustchoosetoapplytheConstitutionasanimplementationoftheBasicLaw,thebasicnatureoftheConstitutiondecidedtoonlycertainprovisionsoftheConstitutioninordertobedirectlyapplicabletotheConstitutionisnotjustapoliticaldeclaration,andthereforegenerallydonotpositiverightwhichshouldbedirectlyapplicableprovisions,theConstitutionisnotthecommonlaw,andthusshouldnotapplyitsprovisionscivicobligationsoreconomicpolicydetails,thesemattersshouldbelefttothelegislature.clarifytheapplicationoftheconstitutionaltextstructure,ChinaConstitutioniscanbeappliedandimplemented.FirstlycriticizedseveraltheoriesofpoliticalconstitutionalismConstitutionapplytheoryinordertoclearobstacles.Secondly,thispaperinvestigatesthebasicprinciplesoftheConstitutionapplies,andproposedscreeningcanbedirectlyapplicableprovisionsneutraltheapplicabilityofthestandards.useofapplicablestandardsoftheConstitutionscreeningof“EightSecondConstitutioninline1paragraph,andthustheformationoftheanapplicableconstitutionalstructure.[Keywords]Constitution,politicalconstitutionalstudies,judicialconstitutionalism,selecttheappropriateIntroduction-theConstitutionappliesthe“middleroad”“EightSecondConstitutionsinceitsenactment,unknowinglyhasexistedforthreedecadesinthepastthreedecades,Chinesesocietyhasundergoneearth-shakingchanges,notonlytherapideconomicgrowth,theeconomic,socialandlegalsystemhasundergoneadramatictransformation,andpeople’sawarenessoftheConstitutionhasalsoundergoneahugechangetotheConstitutionitselfhasexperiencedfourconstitutionalamendment,faithfullyrecordedthehistoryofprogresssincethereformandopeningup,butthisalsoposesaproblem.existingconstitutionwasenactedintheearlydaysofreformandopeningup,adifferencebetweentoday’sChinafarera,whichcertainpartsoftheConstitutioninevitablyreflectssomepoliticalovertones,bidfarewelltotheCulturalRevolution,andtobringorder2outofchaos,theConstitutionstillinevitablylefttracesofthe“revolution”.previousconstitutionalamendmenttoshortenthetextoftheConstitutionandtheever-changingsocietythedistancebetweenthereality,butalsoatensionbetweentheoldandthenewtermsandconditions.WiththeriseinawarenessoftheConstitution,theConstitutionmoreandmorelikeatruesenseofthelaw,“seriouslyConstitutionareincreasinglyvocal,andconstitutedtheacademicmainstreamconsensusoftheChineseConstitution,[1]and”seriouslyThemeaningof“questionsFirstistotakeseriouslytheconstitutionaltext.However,whatatext?“EightSecondConstitutionasawhole?Howtodealwiththetermsofwhichdonothavethelegalproperty?”SeriouslyConstitutionsimplyunderstoodasthewholeoftheConstitutionapplies,theninevitablyfallintomorethanconfused.Mechanismforthelackofimplementationoftheconstitution,ontheotherhand,toincreasethecontrastbetweentheconstitutionalconceptandrealityhasnotbeenenabledduetoaconstitutionalinterpretationmechanismprovidedforinArticle67oftheConstitution,3theconstitutionalnormsdifficultinreallifereflectthelegaleffectivenessof.2001QiYulingcaseonceopenedthedoorofthe“constitutionaljustice”,buttocloseitsdoorsbytheendof2008thecourtagainConstitution.[2]whileinthetheConstitutionappliesencounterbottleneck,thepathofconstitutionalstudiesappeardivided.wellknownabroadConstitutioninthevastmajorityofresearchhasfocusedonspecificissuesandpolicyresearch.emphasisoncasesofcombingandrelatedpoliciesjudgeincommon...