ChineseliterarytheoryaboutmoneyinnovationAbstract:MoneyChineseMr.influentialliterarytheoristofhisproposedAesthetictheoryofreflection,rationalAestheticIdeologyandthenewspiritofliterarytheory,literarytheoryworkedinChinaindustrycausednosmallvibration,themainacademicpointofviewhavethecollegeliterarytextbookswereadoptedandnowalthoughtheseliterarytheoreticalperspectivesarestillsubjecttosomedoubt,butithasaveryprominent,butinnovative,butalsobytherecognitionandpraisemore.Keywords:QianChinese;aestheticreflection;aestheticideology;HumanismAbstract:Mr.QianZhongwenisaChineseinfluentialliterarytheorist,heputforwardtheliteraryaes-thetictheoryofreflection,rationalspiritofaestheticideologytheoryandNewLiteratureinChineseliterarytheorycircles,whichhavecausedgreatvibrationinChineseliterature.Therelativemainaca-demicpointsofviewhavebeenadoptedbycollegesanduniversities---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---textbooks.Today,inspiteofsomeargumentsonthesetheories,alotofpraiseshavebeengiventoitsinnovation.Thediscussionofhisin-novativewillbenefitthebuildingofourcountry\“scurrentliterarytheory.Keywords::QianZhongwen;aestheticreflection;aestheticideology;humanism钱Mr.famouscontemporaryChineseliterarytheorist,literarytheorydecadesofpainstakingresearch,scholarship,schoolsupportdeep,manyachievementsinliterarytheory,thispapermainlydiscussesMr.QianinnovativeliterarytheoryQIANChinesetextofMr.Ideologicalroughlydividedintothefollowingthreeparts:theaesthetictheoryofreflection,rationalspiritofAestheticIdeologyTheoryandNewLiterature.followingonMr.Qianhasdemonstratedintheseinnovativeinitiatesexasaprobe.Oneofanyliterarytheorystudieswillfacesuchaproblem:literatureintheendiswhat?Butmustmakeanunequivocalrightoftheanswerinanswerto“whatisliteratureintheend,”thisissue,themoneyraisedbyMr.Chinesethemselvesdifferentuniqueinsightsinprevious---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---Firstofall,hebelievestherearethreerealneedtodistinguishbetween:Reality,psychologicalrealityandaestheticpsychologicalrealityTherealityisthatthesourceofliteraryandartisticcreation,istheliterarycreationofdeparture,itprovidesallthenecessarymaterialsliteratureItisapurelyobjectiveexistence,weareaccustomedtobeforetheexpression“lifeisasourceofliterarycreation”iswhatitmeans,butthesourceisnotequaltoanobject,theobjectmustbealiteraryintentionsfeelingsthroughbodyrealityisfeelingspenetratethroughthereality,whichistheso-calledpsychologicalrealityaccordingtoQianChinesesaying,“Oncethesubjectindepththerelationshipbetweenobjectivereality,itwillaccepttheavalancheofinformationofallsorts,extensivelyabsorbtherealityandrichnessoffigurative”[a]14,isthesubjectofthementalgraspofrealityandwasintegratedintothesubjectivereality,itisnolongerapurelyobjectiveexistence.purelyobjectiveandscientificexplorationoftheobjectcomparedtoits“isasubjectiveformofaccesstothemainobjectFactorsinthefusionunity“[1]14.---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---Onlysuchapsychologicalrealityisliterarycreationoftheobject.Thisunderstandingseemssimple,butthemoneyChinese先生combinelongandprofoundliterarythinkingabouttheactualresults,whicheffectivelyputanendtoalongliterarytheoristsofliteratureessence“imitation“,”theMirrorsaid,“themisconceptionthatonlytheliterarylifeofsocialrealityasadirect,simple,mechanica...