AnalysisofCriminalReconciliationSystemAbstractaccelerationintheglobalculturalexchangeanddomesticlawharmonioussocietywarmingenvironment,criminalsettlementsystemofcriminallawisbecomingthenewdirectionofresearch.Criminalsettlementreflectsthedominantpositionofthevictimandtheoffenderbothsidesrespecttojusticeandtheinterestsofefficiencytomaximizethevalueinresolvingsocialconflicts,tomakeupforthelackoftraditionalcriminaljusticeplaysanimportantrole.Inseverepunishment,thejudicialsystemandtheprisonburdensome,recidivismratesandcannotbeoptimisticaboutthesituation,giventheimplementationoftheCriminalReconciliationSystemCriminalJusticewithMercydisputeresolutionmechanismnewrevelation.Butcriminalsettlementsystemtheoryandpracticearestilltobeperfected.PaperKeywordsvictimoffenderreconciliationcriminalharmonioussocietyI.IntroductionOfpunishmenthasalwaysbeenregardedbythepublicauthorityandtheStatemonopolyinsevere1punishment,thejudicialsystemandtheprisonburdensome,recidivismratesandcannotbeoptimisticaboutthesituation,thecriminalreconciliationsystemgaveleniencyandstrictimplementationofthenewcriminaldisputesettlementmechanismRevelation.Sincethe1980s,alongwiththeWestvictimprotectionmovement,outofthetraditionalmodeofneglectvictimsdefectlitigationreflection,consultationwithvictimsandcriminaldefendantsfacecriminalreconciliationprocedureasthecenteroftheWesternacademicstudyofthesubjectofcrime,Criminalreconciliationprogramasthemainmodeofoperationhasbecomeahotrestorativejusticeprograms.InTheCriminalJusticePolicy,undertheguidanceofthetheoreticalandpracticalcirclesalsohavelauncheda‘criminalreconciliation’researchfrenzy.Exploringpracticearoundquiteeffective.China’scurrentlegalprovisionshavealsobeentheprototypeofcriminalreconciliation,butonlylimitedprivateprosecution.Althoughthecriminalreconciliationinordertobettersafeguardthelegitimateinterestsofvictims,bringingthecrimedamagedsocialrelationsestablishedassoonaspossible,butinpracticedueto2competinginterestsofmanypartiesdeviatefromtheoriginalpurposeofpre-conceived,andevenendangeritsfoundation,Itisconstructedofcriminalreconciliationsystemfacesamajorchallenge.Willresultifthevictim,theoffendermoneyamongthepoor,difficulttoobtainevidence,leavingthevictimagainsttheirexorbitantlegalfeesreconciliation,suchcriminalsettlementhasbecome‘ahavenfortherichtoavoidlegalaction’i;Similarly,theoffendermaybecompensationfortheConditionsadducemitigatingsuchunreasonabledemands,whichessentiallyshakenthefoundationofthelegitimacyofthecriminalsettlement,yetmanyvictimsandtheirfamiliesareoftentherealreasontoacceptunreasonabledemands,sothatjudgesfaceistoensurethatvictimsreceivecompensationorLetdefendantdeservesdilemmadilemma.Andaslongasthecriminalreconciliationisturnedintocompensationcanberequestedbytheoffendersentencingthereal‘deal.’Therefore,weshouldstartfromthetheoreticallevelforabetterunderstandingofthecriminalsettlement,whichfurtherimproveit,andthenuseittoguidepractice.Second,themeaningandcharacteristicsofcriminal3reconciliation(A)TheconceptofreconciliationastheCriminalProcedureLawofreconciliationinaprofessionaltermthatreferstoadisputethroughvoluntaryagreementbetweenthepartiestoresolvedisputesbehaviorandresults.Accordingtothedifferentnatureofdisputesorlitigation,reconciliationcanbedividedintoacivilsettlement,administrativeandcriminalreconciliationreconciliation.Criminalsettlemento...