讨论称规划生育对孩子心理不利ObservatoryOBSERVATORYStudyMeasuresImpactofChinasOne-ChildPolicyBySINDYAN.BHANOOJanuary16,2022研究称筹划生育对孩子心理不利SINDYAN.BHANOO报道2022年01月16日TheChinesepolicythatlimitsmostfamiliestohavingonechildhashadpsychologicalfalloutforthechildrenbornafteritwasinstitutedin1979,。thatitwillslowthenationsgrowthrateasthepopulationages.最近几年，这项人口控制政策开始遭到一些中国政策顾问和学者得强烈批评，部分原因在于，随着人口老龄化，这一政策将使中国得增长率放缓。翻译：张亮亮PublishedOnlineJanuary102022ScienceExpressIndexReadFullTextforComments(1)ScienceDOI:10.1126/science.1230221ReportLittleEmperors:BehavioralIm。pactsofChinasOne-ChildPolicy1.L.Cameron1,*,2.N.Erkal2,3.L.Gangadharan3,4.X.Meng4+AuthorAffiliations1.1DepartmentofEconometrics,MonashUniversity,Clayton,Victoria3800,Australia.2.2DepartmentofEconomics,UniversityofMelbourne,Victoria3010,Australia.3.3DepartmentofE。conomics,MonashUniversity,Clayton,Victoria3800,Australia.4.4ResearchSchoolofEconomics,CollegeofBusinessandEconomics,AustralianNationalUniversity,ACT0200,Australia.1.*Towhomcorrespondenceshouldbeaddressed.E-mail:lisa.cameronmonash.eduAbstractWedocumentthatChinasOne。-ChildPolicy,oneofthemostradicalapproachestolimitingpopulationgrowth,hasproducedsignificantlylesstrusting,lesstrustworthy,morerisk-averse,lesscompetitive,morepessimistic,andlessconscientiousindividuals.Ourdatawerecollectedfromeconomicsexperimentsconductedwith421。individualsbornjustbeforeandjustaftertheOne-ChildPolicysintroductionin1979.Surveystoelicitpersonalitytraitswerealsoused.WeusetheexogenousimpositionoftheOne-ChildPolicytoidentifythecausalimpactofbeinganonlychild,netoffamilybackgroundeffects.TheOne-Child。PolicythushassignificantramificationsforChinesesociety.Receivedforpublication14September2022.Acceptedforpublication18December2022.TheeditorssuggestthefollowingRelatedResourcesonSciencesitesScience11January2022:Vol.339no.6116p.231DOI:10.1126/science.339.6116.。231-bPodcastsSciencePodcast:11JanuaryShowSummaryListentostoriesonChinasone-childpolicy,anti-inflammatorytherapyforchronicdisease,sellingexpertisetoinvestorsandmore.News&AnalysisCHINAMakingaSelfishGenerationbyFiat1.MaraHvistendahlSummarySelfish,spoiled,andmal。adjusted:StereotypesaboutonlychildrenlivelargeinChina,whereagenerationofsingletonshaslatelyreachedadulthood.Childrenbornaftertheintroductionoftheone-childpolicyin1979werecalledlittleemperors.Nowthattheyaregrownup,ChinaDailyhasdubbedthedemographicthespoil。edgeneration.Butuntilrecently,therewaslittleempiricalevidencetobackupsuchclaims.InapaperpublishedonlinethisweekinScience,researchersattempttomeasurethedegreetowhichtheone-childpolicyhasshapedthepersonalitiesofChinese20-and30-somethings.http:/.sciencemag。.org/content/early/2022/01/09/science.1230221常常批评中国科学界太多人不无正业，他们常紧盯欧美国家“科技前沿”，或发表介绍性得低水平综述文章，或发表没有任何创新可言得重复工作，或者揣摩圣意以研究名义发表不着边际得宏论。究其原因，不是他们创造能力不够，是眼界从来不愿意紧盯实际问题吃剩饭和嗟来之食习惯了。一个例证是，中国筹划生育政策对人口素质到底有何影响，我已经关心多年，却从未找到一篇实证性得论文。昨日检索文献，查到Science近期发表了一篇标题为“LittleEmperors:BehavioralImpactsofChinas。One-ChildPolicy”（小皇帝们：中国“一胎”政策得行为学后果）得文章，下载简单浏览后不禁惊慌失措。这篇Science重量得研究汇报（report）以北京421位“70后”和“80后”成年人为例，通过实验研究发现，1979年忽出生得独生子女们“互信程度地、更加倾向于规避风险、情绪上更加悲观”，换句话说就是“不太信任人，不值的信赖，缺乏竞争力”。这项研究仅以北京为例，样本量并不大，结论是否具有普遍性还有质疑得余地，却能够在Science上发表，足见这个问题得重要程度。为什么这么重要得问题，却没有中国人研究呢？该文引用得
