AnalysisofcriminalcompensationclaimanttheburdenofproofTheabstractproofobligationsofthepartitioncoefficientlegislatorstoguardagainsttheriskofthejudicialprocesscannotbeidentifiedbythefactthat,accordingtotheprincipleofattributionoftherelevantlaws,thelegislativeintentoftheriskinthesubjectoflitigationbetweenapre-assigned.Allocationofburdenofproofinthecaseoflawdoesusuallyjudgeappliedthediscretionarytreatmentofdiscretiononhowtoallocatetheburdenofproofinlitigationbetweentheparties.Wheretheburdenofproof,isalsolosingtheriskliesnotonlyintermsoflitigantsstake,andthustheallocationofburdenofproof,butalsodirectlyrelatedtothelegislativeintentandpurposeoftherelevantlaws,suchastheabilitytoberealized.PaperKeywordsStateliabilityburdenofproofinproceedingsSince1997thebasicstrategyofgoverningthecountryaccordingtolaw,China’ssocialgovernancemodelhasbeenachievedfromthemanagementtothe1service,fromcontrollingthetremendouschangestotheauthorizedgovernancemodel.Inthishistoricalcontext,in2010thenewlyrevised‘StateCompensationLaw,’amoreprominentfunctionalpositioningoftherighttorelief.Boththeprincipleofculpabilityforstatecompensationorstatecompensationproceduresandthescopeofitslegislativechangesmoreconducivetotheprotectionoftherightsoftheclaimantforcompensation.TheCriminalstatepowerandcivilrightsfiercecollisionandconflictareasofhighincidence,thepowerofthestatetoexercisemoreeasilyagainstcitizens’personalrights,propertyrightsandeventherighttolife.Stateliabilityinthenatureofwhatisapubliclawdutyorresponsibilityofprivatelaworacombinationofthetwo,mayresultintheallocationoftheburdenofproofforcriminalcompensationhaveadifferentunderstanding.Accordingly,thisarticleintendstostartfromthenationalnatureoftheliabilitypositioningstudycriminalcompensationclaimant’sburdenofproof,areprovidedforthebenefitofcriminalcompensationjudicialpractice.Theburdenofproofonthetheoreticalbasisofallocationoftheburdenofproof2Theburdenofproof,alsoknownastheburdenofproofisthelitigant’sclaimsinordertogetthesupportandrecognitionofthereferee’scommitmenttogiveevidenceandtheuseofevidencetoprovetheirclaimsinordertoavoidresponsibilityhasadverselitigationconsequences.Romanlawperiod,hadestablisheda‘whoallegesburdenofproof’theburdenofproofprincipleofdistribution.TheburdenofproofinAnglo-Americanlawofevidence,includingproductionofevidenceofresponsibilityandburdenofpersuasion.Theformerreferstothepartiestoprovidesufficientevidencefortheexistenceofafact,sothatitadvocatesthefactstobeestablished,whichhasfavorablereferee;latterreferstothepartyoftheproceedingstotherefereeconvincedallfactshouldbeartheburdenofproof.Incivillaw,theburdenofproofisusuallytheburdenofproofontheburdenofproofonthesignificanceofconductandresultsofmeaning.Theburdenofproofonthesignificanceoftheso-calledactsofthepartiesinordertoavoidtheriskoflosingtheobligationtoprovideevidencethattheexistenceofthefactsofitsclaimofresponsibility,andthereforetheburdenofproofonthe3significanceofconduct,alsoknownassubjectiveburdenofproof;resultoftheburdenofproofinthesenseofalsoknownastheobjectiveburdenofproof,thefactsofthecaseintheauthenticityoftheunknownstatebyassertingtheexistenceofthatfactshallbeartheresponsibilityforitsadverseconsequences.TheburdenofproofassignedtheoreticaloriginsfarbacktoRomantimes.Romantimesontheburdenofproofallocatedmainlyfollowtworules:First,theplaintiffshouldbeartheburdenofpr...