Analysisofnon-criminalpurposesmayconstitutekidnappingcrimeofillegaldetentionAbstractperpetratordidnotkidnapvictim,butthevictimplannedtomeettothefieldtoplay,orplaythevictimPianzhifield,andtoitsthirdparty(usuallyfamilymembers)lied‘kidnapping’thevictimandthusrequires‘ransom’behaviorcanonlybecharacterizedasextortion.Whethertheillegaldetentionofviolence,coercion,fraudandothermeanstocontrolthepersonalfreedomcannotbeachievedwhentheallegedcriminalpurposeotherpocketcharges.PaperKeywordskidnappingcrimeofillegaldetentionFirst,thebasicfacts2008to2010,thedefendantandthevictimTangmouPingmouloveafterbeingintroduced,andcohabitation,afterthevictimTangmoutobreakthroughanumberofcontactswereunsuccessfuldefendantPingmou.1At16:30onJune23,2011Xu,thedefendantandthevictimTangmouPingmoutomeetinthecityJinhuiTown,FengxianDistrict,nearthefarms,andotherwaysofusinglanguagetolurethedaughterTangmouTingting(6years)broughttothecity’sSongjiangDistrictJiutingregions.Thatnight,thedefendantinformedTangmouTingTingPingmouphoneintheirhands,YuxiandaughtertotheirhometownofNinghai;PingmouafterthedefendantandthevictimTangmoudisputeoverthephone,thevictimTangmousaidFengtooktheirdaughterspurposeistogobackinthesoupbeforespendingmoneyatandmadetoreturn50,000yuancanPingmouberecognized.11o’clockthenextday,policeinthecityQibaotownwillrescuethevictimandtheaccusedarrestedPingmouTingting.Second,differencesofopinionCasecharacterizedaskidnapping,extortionandillegaldetention?Therearethreeviews:ThefirstopinionPingmou’sconductconstitutedthecrimeofkidnappingonthegroundsthat:thedefendantPingmouusingverbalwaytolurevictimsasyoungas6yearsoldTingtingcheatfromguardianandto2thevictimTingtingbroughttohishometown,ZhejiangandotherplacesasathreattothevictimTangmoudemanded50,000yuanmoney,aviolationofthevictim’spersonalrightsandpropertyrights,anditsbehavioralcharacteristicsinfullcompliancewithkidnappingelementsofthecrime,althoughnotactuallyget50,000yuan,butthisdoesnotconsummatedkidnappingIdentification.SecondviewPingmou’sconductconstitutedextortiononthegroundsthat:thedefendantPingmouusingverbalwaytolurevictimsasyoungas6yearsoldTingtingbroughttoSongjiangJiuting,thebehaviordoesnotcomplywiththecrimeofkidnappinginviolence,coercionabductionvictimcharacteristics,butthedefendantFengMouliwiththevictimTangmouworriedhisdaughter’sfear,forcingTangmoumakemoney50,000yuanpunishmentdecision,actinfullcompliancewithitselementsofthecrimeofextortion,becausenotactuallyget50,000yuan,itcanbeidentifiedasextortionattempts.3ThirdinopinionPingmou’sconductconstitutedthecrimeofillegaldetentiononthegroundsthat:thedefendantPingmouotherwaysofusingwordstolurevictimsasyoungas6yearsoldliefromtheGuardianTingting,itsmainpurposeistoacttoforcethevictimTangmouMeetmattersratherthandwellontheirbreakupextortion,whichismentionedonthephonetoreturn50,000yuanDepartmentundertheimpulseofangrywords,andwiththevictimTangmou,thespecialrelationshipbetweenthevictimTingting,theirbehaviordoesnotinfringethevictimTangmouwhethertheransommoneytoself-determination,only6yearsoldTingtingvictimsweretakenawayasguardianimmediatelyafterthelossofpersonalfreedom,soitsbehaviorinfullcompliancewithelementsofthecrimeofillegaldetention.Third,legalresearchWeagreewiththethirdview,namelyPingmou’sconductconstitutedthecrimeofillegaldetention.Specificanalysisisasfollows:(A)thepurposeofthecrimesubjectivepointofvie...