AboutthehistoryofmodernChineseliteratureoverseasformAbstract:Hsia’s《《HistoryofModernChineseFiction》》OverseasChinesemodernliteratureisanimportantachievementforthecontinentinthe1980sprovidesanimportantstudyofmodernliteratureandreferencecoordinates.To《《HistoryofModernChineseFiction》》forthestudy,fromthehistoryofmodernliteraryhistoryofthenovelimage,overseasChinesestudiesaswellasdifferenceswithintheideologyoftheliteraryhistoryofseveraldimensions,toteaseouttheinherentcharacteristicsofoverseasChinesestudiesandthestudyofliteraryhistorycannotbeavoided.“power“marks.Keywords:Sinology,《《HistoryofModernChineseFiction》》,literaturestudyofthehistoryofoverseasChinesestudiesgenerallyknownas“Han”,theprocessingofdifferentculturesthroughthestudyshowingaforeign-orientedChinesecultureandforeigncultureinChinaofadoublefeature.Hsia’s《《History---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---ofModernChineseFiction》》80yearsofintellectualcontinentprovidesanimportantstudyofmodernliteratureandliteraryreferencecoordinates.A《《HistoryofModernChineseFiction,“theimageofliteraryhistory,”RewritingLiteraryHistory“isaneweraoftheimportantphenomenaofmodernliterature,Shizhecunsaidthat”neverthoughtofwritingliteraryShihuiChengisaproblem.Writethehistoryofliterature,never‘patent‘...areindependentofeachbook,showingtheauthor’sownliteraryhistory,isanotherwhoisnottheauthorof’rewriting‘“①.Hencethehistoryofliteratureseemstobeemphasized,”rewrite“,andjust“anotherwrote,”butinthe1980s“rewrite”thetrend,whetheritisaspecificrewritetheoperator,ortheprecursorofthefirstadvocatesofstrengtheningtheoriginalisin“anotherwrote,”theliteraturespecificobjectinfrontoftargeted“rewrite”andfocusontheindividualexperienceof“personalcolor”strongwritingofliteraryhistoryispreciselythe“rewritethose”strivetoachievetheidealformandthe“otherwriting”superiorrealm,sothat---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---limelight,“RewritingLiteraryHistory”reallyhavea“revolutionary”content.Hsia《《HistoryofModernChineseFiction》》aregivenakindof“literaryhistoryoftherevolution”to“classicreading”tendtobetheexemplary,“wasModernliteratureisdedicatedto‘rewritethehistoryofliterature’,Hsia’snovelinthehistoryofmodernnovelistsoftheevaluationanddiscussion,eitherexplicitlyorimplicitlytouniteinawaytoentertherevaluationoftheChinesescholar’svisionofmodernliteratureWhetheragreeorquestioned,modernliterature,researchersaredifficulttoavoidandHsia《《FictionHistory》》theviewexpoundedinthedialogueorhiddendialogue“②.“HistoryofModernChineseFiction》》publishedin1961,whenitwonthepraise.DavidTRoy(UniversityofChicago)saiditwas”thefirstseriousstudyoftheEnglishworksofmodernChinesefiction,butalsotheexistingsimilarmonographThebestone......notonlyexperts,eventheChineseorliteraryinteresteveryreader,itwillbetoattract“③.Initspublication38yearslater,PrincetonUniversity,PerryLinkpointedoutthatthe---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---bookinthe“ModernChineseLiterature,andstillnocanbereplacedwithoutanyworkmorethanitcanbemoldedourmodernChineseliterature,thebasicconceptHsiainsight,beautifullanguage,sothat《《FictionHistory》》readveryinteresting,veryenlightening.“④andLeoLeesaid:”Hsia’sbookhasbeenrecognizedasaclassicforhereallyopenedupanewfield,forsimila...