AnalysisofthenewCriminalProcedureLawexclusionaryruleandsuggestionsforimprovementAbstractsincriminalproceedings,theevidenceisthecoreoftheproceedings,oncestarted,frombeginningtoendallrunningaroundtheevidence,butduringoperationwillbeaffectedbymanyfactors,illegalevidenceisoneofthemostimportantone.BasedTheauthorhimselfandjudicialinterpretationofthenewCriminalProcedureLaw“exclusionaryrule”understanding,shallowreferencetothatruleestablishedmeaning,whileimprovingitsownproposalsevidencesystem.PaperKeywordsexclusionaryruleonusproceduraljusticetoprotecthumanrightsFirst,howtounderstand“exclusionaryrule.”(Oneonthe“exclusionaryrule”controversy1issueofthescopeofillegalevidenceforwhatisillegalevidence,2010《《》》isnotrequiredbeforetheintroductionofevidence,fromthe“twohigh”judicialinterpretationsofview,illegalevidencemainlyreferstothetestimonyofwitnesses,victims’statements,confessionoftheaccusedandotherevidenceofillegalwords,notincludingtheevidence,documentaryevidence,transcriptsandotherillegalexaminationsandphysicalevidence,butt---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---heoristsbelievethatnotjustthemanifestationoftheevidencetodefinewhethertheyareillegalevidence,Becauseinvestigatorsworknegligence,businessorlegalconsciousnessarenotfamiliarreasonssuchphysicalevidencecollectedmayalsobeillegalevidencefromthenewCriminalProcedureLawtomodifythesituation,theacademicpointofviewultimatelyadoptedbylegislativebodies.(2)theeffectivenessoftheproblemofillegalevidenceabouttheproblemofillegalevidencefortheeffectivenessofourscholarsholddifferentviews,summarizedincompletelyruledoutthatthefactssayforsurethatdistinctionthatleadsintothatweighcollectingevidencesayssoon.Mostscholarsbelievethattheexclusionaryruleshouldnotputalltheillegalevidenceruledout,forthoseminorviolationsthroughevidenceobtainedshouldnotapplytheexclusionaryrule,forexample,investigatorsattheexaminationofevidencethatdonotaffecttheauthenticityoftheturnovers.Ifthesedefectivetranscriptsalwaysexcludeconfessionswillleadtomanycasesofincompleteevidence,cannotformachainofevidence,withtheresultthatthesanctionofthepeopleescapethelaw,withimpunity.newCriminalProcedureLaw54view,thislegislationweretwoclassificationsofillega---本文于网络，仅供参考，勿照抄，如有侵权请联系删除---levidence:Forcedexclusionandcorrection(ormakeareasonableexplanationruledout.Thisallowsinvestigatingauthoritiesbeartheexplanationsandevidencedisputedobligation,butalsogivesthejudgemustdiscretion.3burdenofproof.ImplementationofCriminalProcedure“whoadvocates,whoproof”principle,thedirectionofthecourtifthedefendantrequestedexclusionofillegalevidence,itmustsubmitevidenceoftheexistenceofillegalactsevidence,thattheburdenofproofontheaccusedparty,whilethelegalprofessionandLitigationscholarsarguedthattheprocessofexclusionofillegalevidenceshoulddrawontheallocationoftheburdenofproofinadministrativeproceedings“burdenofproof”ofthedistribution.newCriminalProcedureLaw56paragraph2,“thepartiesandtheircounsel,litigationagenthastherighttoapplytocourtforillegalmethodstocollectevidencetobeexcludedbylaapplyexcludeillegalmethodstocollectevidence,shouldprovidecluesormaterial.“provisionsofthecontentfromthepointofview,stillnotadoptedthe”burdenofproof“proposal,butstressedthattheburdenofprovingthedefendantanddefensecounsel,thejudgeonlyinthecollection...